Everything, Everywhere
Verified Specification | Standardized Formulas | Instant Precision
Secure & Private (Zero Data Retention) Free Access • No Sign-Up

PAKE & OPAQUE Zero-Knowledge Authentication Studio

Model next-generation Zero-Knowledge Password-Authenticated Key Exchange protocols (RFC 9497 OPAQUE, RFC 9383 SPAKE2+). Simulate Oblivious PRF (OPRF) blinding, sealed credential envelopes, and mathematical immunity to offline database dictionary cracking.

RFC 9497 OPAQUE Zero-Knowledge aPAKE Offline Attack Immune
Underlying cryptographic key exchange mechanism
Curve group for OPRF and Diffie-Hellman operations
Simulate system resistance under active adversary attacks
Testing vulnerability to brute-force dictionary attacks

🔐 Interactive Cryptographic Handshake & OPRF Blinding Exchange

Mutual Session Established
Offline Dictionary Resistance
100% Immune
Requires online OPRF queries
Server Compromise Impact
Zero Password Exposure
Envelope ciphertext is uncrackable
Network Privacy (Eavesdropper)
Zero-Knowledge
Blinded group element transmitted
Derived Shared Secret
256-Bit HKDF Key
Perfect Forward Secrecy (PFS)

📐 Cryptographic Phase Derivations & Elliptic Curve Scalars

Deriving OPRF elliptic curve scalar multiplication...

      

⚠️ 5 Fatal Traps in PAKE & OPAQUE Cryptographic Deployments

1. Using Plain Curve25519 Instead of Ristretto255 for OPRF: Standard Curve25519 points have a small cofactor of 8. Computing OPRF scalar multiplication directly on Curve25519 allows small subgroup attacks where malicious inputs leak bits of the server OPRF private key $k$. RFC 9497 mandates ristretto255 (or prime-order Decaf) to enforce a pure prime-order group with zero cofactor leakage.
2. Storing the OPRF Key in the General User Database: The server OPRF key $k$ is the sole cryptographic barrier preventing offline dictionary attacks against stolen envelopes. Storing $k$ in the same database table as user envelopes defeats OPAQUE. In production, $k$ must reside in Hardware Security Modules (HSM) or cloud KMS with strict rate-limiting per second.
3. Omitting the Memory-Hard Hash (Argon2id) Prior to OPRF: Relying solely on fast SHA-256 for $H( ext{password})$ allows an attacker who compromises the server OPRF key to test 100 billion passwords per second on GPUs. OPAQUE implementations must apply a memory-hard function (Argon2id or Scrypt) during client-side envelope key derivation.
4. Client Blinding Nonce Reuse: Reusing the random scalar blinding nonce $r$ across multiple authentication attempts compromises the client's blinding security. The scalar $r$ must be generated using a cryptographically secure random number generator (CSPRNG) fresh for every single session.
5. Missing Server Identity Authentication in Envelope: If the client credential envelope does not seal and authenticate the server's public key ($ ext{server\_pub}$), a rogue server could replay stolen envelopes to impersonate authentic backend instances without being detected by the client.
Sponsored Utility
While You're Here
Sponsored Recommendations
Advertisement